The Censorship of the Internet?

In a new series of blogs, I will discuss what I believe is the usurping of, and attempted control of information on the Internet.

The internet may be one the last platforms for free speech left. But is it really free? Many alternative and radical ideas do seem to gain steam online where a financial publisher is not needed, so at first glance it seems free. The enemy of free speech is censorship and it seems to be rampant on the internet right now. This censorship; or manipulation may be a more appropriate term, is veiled and not easily noticeable unless you know what to look for. It comes in the annoying form of “debunking”, deleting and the control of what content gets released.

In this blog post, we are going to discuss one particular website; Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia service that has information about just about any topic imaginable. I believe that the proprietors of Wikipedia, are paid by (or forced by) the government or by corporations to distort or censor information on the Internet. I will present several examples of this. Again, it seems that cutting-edge political and esoteric knowledge is under attack.

Physicist, Nassim Haramein is a prime example of this censorship that I’m talking about. If you don’t already know about Nassim Haramein you must certainly check out his work. His website and foundation is called The Resonance Project. He has made some groundbreaking discoveries in the world of quantum physics and is presenting his ideas on his website and on various videos on YouTube which I have posted on my blog in the past. Apparently, he doesn’t live up to the “standards” that Wikipedia has for it’s entries. His Wiki page has been taken down several times already. (Keep in mind, that these entries can be made by anyone and submitted to Wikipedia for approval). This is what is listed for him instead of a Wiki page: Rational Wikipedia. What a smear campaign! (RationalWiki is not affiliated with Wikipedia by-the-way .)

Nassim is not the only one getting shut out by Wiki. Radical journalist, Abby Martin spoke out recently about her Wiki page censorship.

It seems that powers in high places don’t want us to have access to powerful alternative information like Martin and Haramein have to offer. Wikipedia tries to play these things off by stating that the individuals are not reputable enough. As if a lot of the horribly incorrect information that gets posted on there is credible or reputable!

Another example of Wikipedia’s stranglehold on its information is represented by this quote from researcher Jim Fetzer

“Wikipedia: What it Doesn’t Say:
I have just spent several frustrating hours trying to revise and improve the entry on “Scholars for 9/11 Truth”, only to discover that my rewrites were being over-ridden by someone at Wikipedia. I find that offensive. The present entry has a warning label stating, “The neutrality of this article is disputed.” From what I can discern from reviewing the “Talk Page”, persons with scant or biased knowledge of the society appear to be determining the contents. So I agree with the warning but not for the reasons that may have motivated it. ”

James H. Fetzer
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth

All of this, along with the fact that every page dealing with an esoteric topic, such as Sacred Geometry, Hermeticism, The Emerald Tablet, etc. are made to look foolish or presented as a purely speculation.
So, it appears that these deceptions and deletions are rampant. It becomes quickly obvious that Wikipedia is being controlled. Whether by corporate interests or the government, it’s hard to say. In any event, it is up to us as citizens seeking truth and freedom to speak out against hypocrisy like this and help keep the internet a free platform for all types of information!

Advertisements

One thought on “The Censorship of the Internet?

  1. Fetzering

    Noun:
    1. The act of making an unfounded or unsubstantiated claim.

    2. In philosophy, a method of debate or discussion based of the
    premise of: I think, therefore I am. I think you’re wrong. therefore you
    are.

    3. The act of disagreeing by employing rancor, name calling, ad hominem attacks or straw man argument.

    Etymology:
    Fetzering began in earnest in the late 1960’s, being implemented by a
    JFK conspiracy theorist and has since expanded it’s use in the 9/11
    debate arena.

    1. Without evidence your claim is simple fetzering.

    2. He should rely on his data instead of fetzering.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fetzering

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s