The Censorship of the Internet?

In a new series of blogs, I will discuss what I believe is the usurping of, and attempted control of information on the Internet.

The internet may be one the last platforms for free speech left. But is it really free? Many alternative and radical ideas do seem to gain steam online where a financial publisher is not needed, so at first glance it seems free. The enemy of free speech is censorship and it seems to be rampant on the internet right now. This censorship; or manipulation may be a more appropriate term, is veiled and not easily noticeable unless you know what to look for. It comes in the annoying form of “debunking”, deleting and the control of what content gets released.

In this blog post, we are going to discuss one particular website; Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia service that has information about just about any topic imaginable. I believe that the proprietors of Wikipedia, are paid by (or forced by) the government or by corporations to distort or censor information on the Internet. I will present several examples of this. Again, it seems that cutting-edge political and esoteric knowledge is under attack.

Physicist, Nassim Haramein is a prime example of this censorship that I’m talking about. If you don’t already know about Nassim Haramein you must certainly check out his work. His website and foundation is called The Resonance Project. He has made some groundbreaking discoveries in the world of quantum physics and is presenting his ideas on his website and on various videos on YouTube which I have posted on my blog in the past. Apparently, he doesn’t live up to the “standards” that Wikipedia has for it’s entries. His Wiki page has been taken down several times already. (Keep in mind, that these entries can be made by anyone and submitted to Wikipedia for approval). This is what is listed for him instead of a Wiki page: Rational Wikipedia. What a smear campaign! (RationalWiki is not affiliated with Wikipedia by-the-way .)

Nassim is not the only one getting shut out by Wiki. Radical journalist, Abby Martin spoke out recently about her Wiki page censorship.

It seems that powers in high places don’t want us to have access to powerful alternative information like Martin and Haramein have to offer. Wikipedia tries to play these things off by stating that the individuals are not reputable enough. As if a lot of the horribly incorrect information that gets posted on there is credible or reputable!

Another example of Wikipedia’s stranglehold on its information is represented by this quote from researcher Jim Fetzer

“Wikipedia: What it Doesn’t Say:
I have just spent several frustrating hours trying to revise and improve the entry on “Scholars for 9/11 Truth”, only to discover that my rewrites were being over-ridden by someone at Wikipedia. I find that offensive. The present entry has a warning label stating, “The neutrality of this article is disputed.” From what I can discern from reviewing the “Talk Page”, persons with scant or biased knowledge of the society appear to be determining the contents. So I agree with the warning but not for the reasons that may have motivated it. ”

James H. Fetzer
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth

All of this, along with the fact that every page dealing with an esoteric topic, such as Sacred Geometry, Hermeticism, The Emerald Tablet, etc. are made to look foolish or presented as a purely speculation.
So, it appears that these deceptions and deletions are rampant. It becomes quickly obvious that Wikipedia is being controlled. Whether by corporate interests or the government, it’s hard to say. In any event, it is up to us as citizens seeking truth and freedom to speak out against hypocrisy like this and help keep the internet a free platform for all types of information!

Advertisements

Under Oath

The beginning of the 2012 Presidential inauguration was begun with President Obama repeating the Presidential Oath of Office. The defining statement made during this oath is that the incoming President is to uphold and defend the Constitution. The statement was repeated with conviction by President Obama as he was sworn in and assumed the second term of his Presidency. This coming from a man who is trying to trash the Second Amendment and disarm the people, while police and military line our streets, armed to the hilt. This is not to say that I support guns. Frankly, I despise them, but having them IS a Constitutional right.

This got me to thinking about the way in which oaths don’t seem to carry the clout that they once had. The Constitution is being dismantled more each day. Rights are being revoked by those who’s job it is to uphold them.

This is not on Obama alone. Our government has been corrupt for a long time and is only getting worse. Its corrupt on so many levels. Former President George W. Bush once called the Constitution “a Goddamn piece of paper.” A piece of paper that he had sworn under oath to protect and enforce! This statement just goes to show how lightly this oath has been taken. The Constitution is more of an inconvenience to modern politics than it is a point of pride. Big business and their campaign funding has ruined what was left of our crumbling Democracy. The Constitution just keeps getting in the way.

The First Amendment states that we are to have freedom of speech and press and of peaceful assembly. The media is owned and controlled by the corporations and peaceful protestors are pepper-sprayed and beaten.

These men need to be held accountable for their indiscretions against the laws that they are supposed to be upholding. They need to act as public servants rather than making the public serve them. They need to take these oaths seriously. They swore to uphold our rights. They swore to God!
hand-on-bible